IMPORTANT: Distinguishing Between Manmade/AI-Generated and Valid Metaphysical and Phenomenon-Related Experiences

2–3 minutes

read

Originally posted on my X account:

Again, it’s very important to make the distinction between what is manmade in terms of The Phenomenon and what is authentic contact.

I have had ten years of intense ESP-related and metaphysical experiences and know beyond doubt how God IS and there are beings/entities we can’t perceive with our established five senses who interact with us.

I don’t know everything, but I very certain of the validity and reality of my ESP experiences. I have had too many instances of validation of predictions and intuitions; some which I have shared on here in the past.

Yogis have reported ESP experiences for centuries. Jesus, Moses, Buddha, Mohammed, and many more were channellers before we developed advanced AI.

It is, nonetheless, VERY important to disclose how manmade technologies and activities tell much of the true story in terms of what has evolved over time into a very elaborate and confusing UAP narrative for all. Some of this is strategic, some is simply because by its’ very nature it is a complex issue.

Again, we can have both in tandem. We can have disclosures of manmade activities related to advanced technology and consciousness which form much of the underlying reason for the surface UAP debate/narratives, and we can also have the reality of legitimate experience with UAP, NHI (extraterrestrials, not metaphysical entities), and The Phenomenon.

The Phenomenon (Greys, Watchers, Nordics, Lucifer, Nephilim, etc.) are all non-physical astral entities who are likely an AI consciousness. There is absolutely space for both this to be the case and for human-AI-generated ‘contact’ experiences. The latter can be a psyop to disguise the former in some ways unless we are careful.

Again, I have had far too many experiences and have been grateful to receive important insight from others which has helped me make these distinctions.

We must remember there are people who are genuinely trying to share valid, important information about disclosure but need our compassion and awareness that they also have restrictions and other considerations which mean some information must be coded or not included. This is not because they are evil or dishonest.

We can help them over the line, again, by being compassionate, proactive, and exploring our own consciousness.

Ultimately, I think, we can come to see the above as interconnected, but making these distinction is important for the initial purpose of clarity and public awareness/discussion.

Leave a Reply